A portal for homeopathic students, teachers & professionals



whole web in this site

Recommend this site
  Home    |     About Us   |    Latest   |    Links   |    Guest Book   |    Contact
 
   Professional
    Homeopathic Education
Homeopathy General
Homeopathic Materia Medica
Materia Medica - Group Study
Homeopathic Repertory
Organon and Philosophy
Homeopathic Pharmacy
Practice of Medicine
Case Presentations
Clinical Tips
Psychology
Research
Pioneers
Homeopathic Drug Proving
Homeopathic Softwares
     
   Competitive
   

Exam Notifications
Exam Results
MOH(UAE) War room
MD(Hom) Entrance
Kerala PSC (Tutor)
Kerala PSC (MO)
UPSC (MO/Lecturer)
Nurse cum Pharmacist
Ask Dr.Mansoor

     
   Read
    Book reviews
Latest Books
Journal reviews
Thesis for PGs
Softwares
Medical Ethics
Hahnemannian Oath
     
    Last Moment Revisions
    Materia Medica
Case taking & Repertory
Homeopathic Pharmacy
Organon of Medicine
Practice of Medicine
Forensic Medicine
Anatomy
Physiology
Biochemistry

Mind Rubrics
Kent's Repertory
Boger's Repertory
Easy Materia Medica
Easy Organon
     
   Informations
    Opportunities in Homeopathy
Notifications
Homeo world
Events
  Kerala
  National
  International
     
   Similima
    About Us
Our team
Our motto
Perspectives
Donate
Advertise
Disclaimer
Site map
Copy right
Privacy Policy
Guidelines to authors

 
   
   
   
   Recommend this page to a friend
   Send your Feedback

A Study on Effect of Matricaria chamomilla Potencies

    on Central Nervous System of Experimental Animal

       Dr.A.B.Ram Jyothis.M.D (Hom)

Lecturer, Department of Pharmacy

Fr.Muller Homeopathic Medical College. Mangalore

 

 
Abstract

Background: For almost a hundred years homeopaths have attempted to demonstrate the existence of the "potency effect" scientifically. The general implication of all this work is that highly dilute solutions (Homoeopathic potencies) do have effects that can be demonstrated in carefully controlled laboratory experiments. The present study aims to evaluate the effects of high potency in experimental animal and to evaluate the effects of 3x, 30c and 0/3 potencies of Matricaria Chamomilla on Central Nervous System.

Methods: The blind screening methodologies, well known in modern Psycho- Neuro pharmacology (Acto- photometer, Rota – rod apparatus, Eddy’s Hot plate, Maximal – electro shock method) were utilized for Central Nervous System action investigations.

Results: The results were statistically processed by Analysis of variance test (ANOVA) to compare the effects on treatment groups before and after treatment with control group and Dunnet’s t test were used to determine the effect of each treatment against control group. The results shows that Matricaria chamomilla 0/3, significantly reduce locomotor activity, exhibit muscle relaxant activity, causing analgesia and shows anti-convulsant activity than Matricaria chamomilla 3x and Matricaria chamomilla 30c.

Conclusion: This experimental study, revealed that high dilution when get dynamised by the process of succussion can have a significant effect on biological system. The central nervous system depression is significantly performed by 0/3 potencies than 3x and 30c.   

(Keywords – Matricaria chamomilla, C.N.S stimulant/depressant activity, muscle relaxant activity, Analgesic activity, Anti convulsant activity)  

 

Introduction

The purpose of fundamental research is to describe and possibly to understand the phenomena purported by homoeopathy, using the experimental method. Experimental method is based on the assumption that any hypothesis should be testable, i. e. measurements can be done to prove or disprove it. To do this, we need specific and carefully selected experimental models.

    Similar to clinical study, laboratory research is able to show biological activity of homeopathic remedies that cannot be explained as a placebo response. Laboratory research is also capable of shedding some new light on how the homeopathic remedies may work.  This study intended to verify the effect of Matricaria Chamomilla in various potencies on central nervous system of experimental animal and it may help to understand the biological phenomenon of the high potencies. 

 

Aims and Objectives

  1. To evaluate the effects of high potency in Experimental Animal.

  2. To evaluate the effects of 3x, 30c and 0/3 potencies of Matricaria  chamomilla on Central nervous system.

Materials and Methods

  Materials:

    Plant: Matricaria chamomilla

    The Plant, Matricaria chamomilla was collected from Ooty under the supervision of Dr.D.Suresh Baburaj, Survey Officer, Medicinal plants survey and collection unit, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ooty, India. The mother tincture of Matricaria chamomilla was extracted as per the directions given in Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India (Vol- 5, 1986)1. The 3x and 30c potency of Matricaria chamomilla were prepared with acqua distillata and 0/3 potency of Matricaria chamomilla brought from a reputed firm, which were used in this experiment. 

Animals:  

Male albino mice (Swiss strain) were procured from Sri Venkateswara Enterprises, Bangalore, India and bred in the animal house of Vinayaka Mission’s College of Pharmacy, Salem, India. They were fed on commercial diet and water adlibitum during the experiments. The pellet food containing 22.5% protein, 72.55% carbohydrate, 5% fat and sufficient vitamins and minerals. The cages were placed in well-ventilated place in the laboratory and were provided with 1.5 inches rice-bran bedding which was changed every day. The room temperature was maintained at 25+ 1oc . The animals were selected randomly. The study was approved by Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of Vinayaka Mission’s college of pharmacy, Salem, South India. Five groups (I-V), each comprising of six animals weighing between (20-25g) were selected.

 

                 GROUP-I -Control group without any treatment

           GROUP-II - Group treated with standard drugs (Dose according to drugs used)

            GROUP III - Group treated with Matricaria chamomilla 3x,

                   10 ml/Kg/ p.o, four times/ day for one day.

            GROUP IV- Group treated with Matricaria chamomilla 30c,

                                 10 ml/Kg/ p.o, two times/ day for three days.

            GROUP V- Group treated with Matricaria chamomilla 0/3,

                                 10 ml/Kg/ p.o, two times/ day for three days.

 

The test was made three hours after the latest administration of drug. 

Screening Methods for C.N.S Depressant Drugs.  

The blind screening methodology, well known in Psyco-Neuro pharmacology was utilized for Central Nervous System actions investigations.

A) Rota rod with compartments – muscle relaxant property2, 3:

First the animal is trained to stand on the rotating rod at slow speeds.  Once the animal is trained the platform where the animal will fall is lifted slightly upward to restart the counter.  After the counter is switched on the animal will keep on balancing on the rotating rod and at one stage it will fall on the platform and at this stage the counter will stop.  The time is noted directly in seconds from the counter.  The cut off time to animals to fall from the rotating rod at a recommended speed is fixed at (120 Sec) and those animals stay on the rotating rod more than the cutoff time are discarded from the study.

     The same experiment is repeated at different speeds of the rod and also after administering suitable drug to the animal.  There is a reset button provided by the side of each counter that is used to reset the counter to Zero after each record is taken.  The complete setup is designed to work under 230 V 50 Hz.A.C.

 

The endurance time in seconds before and after the drug administration is recorded from digital counter.  Those animals which fall off from the rod after administration of test drug (e.g. Muscle relaxant drugs) show adjustment difficulty to stand on the rotating rod.  This indirectly shows the muscle weakness and inco-ordination of the animals due to the relaxation of skeletal muscles.  The drugs with muscle relaxant activity (Central/Peripheral), Sedatives, Anxiolytic drugs (Diazepam type) will show lesser time of standing when compared to pretreatment.   

B) Eddy’s hot plate – Analgesic activity4:

    In this method heat is used as a source of pain. Animals are individually placed on a hot plate maintained at constant temperature (55C) and the reaction of animals, such as paw licking or jump response is taken as the end point. Analgesics increase the reaction – time.

C) Acto- photo meter – C.N.S stimulant/depressant activity5, 6:

1. The instrument consists of a cage which is 30 cm long and 30 cm deep.   It has wire mesh at the bottom.

2.  Six lights and 6 photocells are placed in the outer periphery of the bottom in    such a way that a single mouse can block only one beam.

3. Technically its principle is that a photocell is activated when the rays of light failing on photocells are cut off by animals crossing the beam of light. 

4. Photocells are connected to an electronic automatic counter device which   counts the number of “cutoffs”.

D) Maximal electro - shock method (M.E.S) – Anti convulsant activity7, 8:

The maximal electro – shock (M.E.S) induced convulsions in animal represent grand mal type of epilepsy. In M.E.S convulsions electric shock is applied through the corneal electrodes. Through optic stimulation cortical excitation is produced. The M.E.S convulsions are divided into five phases such as tonic flexion, tonic extension, clonic convulsion, stupor and recovery or death. Note the time (in seconds) spent by the animal in each phase of convulsions. A substance is known to possess anticonvulsant property if it reduces or abolishes the extensor phase of M.E.S convulsions. This procedure may be used to produce convulsion both in rats and mice. For rat, 150 mA current is applied for 0.2 seconds and for mice 50 mA current is applied for 0.2 seconds.   

Statistical Analysis

The results were statistically processed by Analysis of variance test (ANOVA) to compare the effects on treatment groups before and after treatment with control group and Dunnet’s t test were used to determine the effect of each treatment against control group.

The null hypothesis (H0) was assumed that there was no difference in effects of treatments between the treatment groups compared with control group and alternate hypothesis (H1) was assumed there was significant difference in effect of treatment between the treatment groups compared with control group.

 

Observation

The mice of untreated, control group showed restless, hyper motility and fast climbing behaviour.

The mice treated with standard drug group did not show greed for eating and drinking. They drank very small quantity of water during the experiment. They showed a decrease in locomotor activity and quietness.

The mice treated with Matricaria Chamomilla 3x showed hypomotility, increased threshold to pain stimuli, decreased muscle grip and decreased extensor phase in convulsions.

The mice treated with Matricaria Chamomilla 30c showed reduced locomotor activity, increased threshold to pain stimuli, decreased muscle grip and decreased extensor phase in convulsions.

The mice treated with Matricaria Chamomilla 0/3 showed hypomotility, increased threshold to pain stimuli, decreased muscle grip and decreased extensor phase in convulsions than group treated with Matricaria Chamomilla 3x and Matricaria Chamomilla 30c.         

                           Result

 Locomotor activity

Before treatment:  From table 2, calculated F- value (1.92) is compared with table F- value (4.18) with 4, 25 df at 1% level of significance. Therefore the calculated F value is less than table F value. So the null hypothesis is accepted and there is no significant difference in the locomotor activity among the groups before treatment. 

   After treatment: From table 3, calculated F- value (5.32) is compared with table F- value (4.18) with 4, 25 df at 1% level of significance. Therefore the calculated F value is greater than table F value. So the null hypothesis is rejected and there is significant difference in the locomotor activity among the groups after treatment.  

The standard drug, Phenobarbitone sodium (40mg/Kg, i.p) reduce the locomotor activity by 65.39% (P<0.001), Chamomilla 0/3 (10 ml/Kg, o.p) reduce the locomotor activity by 46.54% (P<0.001), Chamomilla 30c (10 ml/Kg, o.p) reduce the locomotor activity by 26.08% (P<0.001) and Chamomilla 3x (10 ml/Kg, o.p) reduce the locomotor activity by 18.25% (P<0.001).

Muscle relaxant activity:

Before treatment:

From the table 6, calculated F- value (1.09) is compared with table F- value (4.18) with 4, 25 df at 1% level of significance. Therefore the calculated F value is less than table F value. So the null hypothesis is accepted and there is no significant difference in the Muscle relaxant activity among the groups before treatment.  

 After treatment:

 

From the table 7, calculated F- value (7.09) is compared with table F- value (4.18) with 4, 25 df at 1% level of significance. Therefore the calculated F value is greater than table F value. So the null hypothesis is rejected and there is significant difference in the Muscle relaxant activity among the groups after treatment.

          

The standard drug, Diazepam (4mg/Kg, i.p) reduce the fall off time by 49.65% (P<0.001), Chamomilla 3x (10 ml/Kg, o.p) reduce the fall off time  by 35.93% (P<0.001), Chamomilla 0/3 (10 ml/Kg, o.p) reduce the fall off time  by 16.53% (P<0.05) and Chamomilla 30c (10 ml/Kg, o.p) reduce the fall off time  by 9.84% (P<0.05).

 Analgesic activity:      

 Before treatment: From the table 10, calculated F- value (2.72) is compared with table F- value (4.18) with 4, 25 df at 1% level of significance. Therefore the calculated F value is less than table F value. So the null hypothesis is accepted and there is no significant difference in the Analgesic activity among the groups before treatment. 

  After treatment:From the table 11, calculated F- value (18.55) is compared with table F- value (4.18) with 4, 25 df at 1% level of significance. Therefore the calculated F value is greater than table F value. So the null hypothesis is rejected and there is significant difference in the Analgesic activity among the groups after treatment.

The standard drug, Pentazocine (5mg/Kg, i.p) increase the reaction time by 65% (P<0.001), Chamomilla 0/3 (10 ml/Kg, o.p) increase the reaction time by 49.03% (P<0.001), Chamomilla 3x (10 ml/Kg, o.p) increase the reaction time by 46.51% (P<0.001) and Chamomilla 30c (10 ml/Kg, o.p) increase the reaction time by 26.98% (P<0.001).

 

Anti- convulsant activity: 

After treatment:

From the table 14, calculated F- value (26.52) is compared with table F- value (4.18) with 4, 25 df at 1% level of significance. Therefore the calculated F value is greater than table F value. So the null hypothesis is rejected and there is significant difference in the Anti-Convulsant activity among the groups after treatment.

The standard drug, Phenytoin (25mg/Kg, i.p) decrease extensor phase to 1.5 seconds (P<0.001), Chamomilla 0/3 (10 ml/Kg, o.p) decrease extensor phase to 4.3 seconds (P<0.001), Chamomilla 3x (10 ml/Kg, o.p) decrease extensor phase to 6.5 seconds (P<0.001) and Chamomilla 30c (10 ml/Kg, o.p) decrease extensor phase to 6.83 seconds (P<0.001).

 

Discussion

In homoeopathy, Matricaria chamomilla is used for unbearable colic and pains in different locations accompanied by an excitation of central nervous system. It is also used in convulsions consecutive to a state of furious agitation. In short, it can be used to depress central nervous system activities9.

The results of the present study show some inhibitory effects of Chamomilla potencies on central nervous system. The central nervous system depression is significantly performed by 0/3 potencies than 3x and 30c.

Referring to the previous studies in this area, an experimental pharmacological research performed by Guillemain (1983) showed that, at 3c and 4c dilutions, the Chamomilla significantly diminishes the number of fights in rats after exposing to electric shock. The study also showed that Chamomilla 3c and 4c decreased caffeine induced motor hyperactivity in male rats10. Another study conducted by Criestea (1996) Chamomilla 5c has a stimulatory action on central nervous system of experimental animal with hypomotility. This study also reveals that Chamomilla 30c has an inhibitory effect on central nervous system activities of experimental animal with hypermotility11. But the results of the present study concurrent with the statement of Richard Hughes that Chamomilla is one of those drugs whose effect of crude and infinitesimal doses are about identical12

 

                                         Table – 13

                                       Anti-convulsant activity against Maximal Electro-shock-induced Convulsions                                                

 

Group

 

Treatment

 

Dose

 

Flexion

  (sec)

 

Extensor

  (sec)

 

Clonus

  (sec)

Recovery/

Death

 

 

1

 

Control

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

2.3±0.12

 

9.6±0.8

 

1.6±0.21

 

136±3.98

 

2

 

Phenytoin

 

 

25mg/kg

    i.p

 

0.83±0.06

 

1.5±0.22

 

1.16±0.29

 

17.5±1.43

 

3

 

Chamomilla3x

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

2±0.25

 

6.5±0.72

 

1.5±0.22

 

142.5±6.64

 

4

 

Chamomilla30c

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

1.5±0.34

 

6.83±0.6

 

1.66±0.3

 

142.16±7.46

 

5

 

Chamomilla0/3

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

2±0.25

 

4.3±0.87

 

1.5±0.22

 

132.66±10.17

 

                                  Number of animals used in each group: 6

     

                                          The results are in Mean±SEM

                                                                                                     Table - 2

Analysis of variance table for locomotor activity before treatment.                                                

Source of variation

 df

Sum of squares

Mean sum of   squares

F-ratio

F-table      value

 

Treatment

 

Error

 

5-1=4

 

29- 4=25

 

9159.20

 

29712.17

 

2289.8

 

1188.48

 

 

1.92***

 

 

4.18

Total

30- 1=29

38871.37

 

 

 

***P > 0.01, df 4, 25.

 

 

 

Table – 3

         Analysis of variance table for locomotor activity after treatment.                                              

Source of variation

 df

Sum of squares

Mean sum of   squares

F-ratio

F-table      value

 

Treatment

 

Error

 

5-1=4

 

29- 4=25

 

26276.13

 

30860.67

 

6569.03

 

1234.42

 

 

5.32***

 

 

4.18

Total

30- 1=29

38871.37

 

 

 

***P < 0.01, df 4, 25.

  

 

                                                             Table - 5

                                    Muscle relaxant property-Rota-rod apparatus

 

Group

 

Treatment 

 

 Dose        

Fall off time in sec before treatment

 Fall off time in sec after

treatment

 

% decrease

     in time

 

1

 

Control

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

345.83±18.79

 

349.16±22.08

 

0.96%

 

2

 

Diazepam

 

 

4mg/kg

    i.p

 

312.5±10.68

 

157.33±13.11

 

49..65%

 

3

 

Chamomilla3x

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

372±31.86

 

238.33±51.47

 

35.93%

 

4

 

Chamomilla 30c

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

335.16±22.60

 

302.16±19.10

 

9.84%

 

5

 

Chamomilla0/3

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

369±28.67

 

308±17.62

 

16.53%

 

                                   Number of animals used in each group: 6

     

                                         The results are in Mean±SEM 

 

     

                                                        Table - 6

      Analysis of variance table for Muscle relaxant activity before treatment.

                                                   

Source of variation

 df

Sum of squares

Mean sum of   squares

F-ratio

F-table      value

 

Treatment

 

Error

 

5-1=4

 

29- 4=25

 

14643.53

 

83825.17

 

3660.88

 

3353.01

 

 

1.09***

 

 

4.18

Total

30- 1=29

98468.7

 

 

 

***P > 0.01, df 4, 25.

 

                               

                 Table – 7

        Analysis of variance table for Muscle relaxant activity after treatment.                                                  

Source of variation

 df

Sum of squares

Mean sum of   squares

F-ratio

F-table      value

 

Treatment

 

Error

 

5-1=4

 

29- 4=25

 

134625.66

 

118640.34

 

33656.42

 

4745.61

 

 

7.09***

 

 

4.18

Total

30- 1=29

253266

 

 

 

***P < 0.01, df 4, 25.

  

 

                                                               Table - 8

           Dunnet’s t test table against control for Muscle relaxant activity

 

Statistic

 

Diazepam

 

Chamomilla 3x

     

 

Chamomilla 30c

       

            Chamomilla 0/3                 

 

   

       t

  

  10.78**** 

  

    6.23****

      

    2.64**

       

     2.31**

                                        ****P < 0.001, **P < 0.05, df 25                              

  Table – 9

                         Analgesic effect – Eddy’s hot plate                                                 

 

Group

 

Treatment

 

Dose

Basal reaction time. (sec)

Reaction time after treatment.(sec)

% increase

in reaction time

 

1

 

Control

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

4.66±0.33

 

4.5±0.22

 

3.55%

 

2

 

Pentazocine

 

 

5mg/kg

    i.p

 

3.5±0.22

 

10±0.73

 

65%

 

3

 

Chamomilla3x

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

4.3±0.21

 

6.3±0.44

 

46.51%

 

4

 

Chamomilla30c

 

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

4.6±0.33

 

6.3±0.42

 

26.98%

 

5

 

Chamomilla0/3

 

10ml/kg

    p.o

 

4.5±0.34

 

8.83±0.47

 

49.03%

 

                                      Number of animals used in each group: 6

                                         The results are in Mean±SEM

 

                                                   Table - 10

             Analysis of variance table for Analgesic activity before treatment.                                                 

Source of variation

 df

Sum of squares

Mean sum of   squares

F-ratio

F-table      value

 

Treatment

 

Error

 

5-1=4

 

29- 4=25

 

 5.67

 

 13

 

 1.417

 

 0.52

 

 

2.72***

 

 

4.18

Total

30- 1=29

18.27

 

 

 

***P > 0.01, df 4, 25.

 

  

      Table - 11

              Analysis of variance table for Analgesic activity after treatment.

                                          

Source of variation

 df

Sum of squares

Mean sum of   squares

F-ratio

F-table      value

 

Treatment

 

Error

 

5-1=4

 

29- 4=25

 

 115.8

 

 39

 

 28.95

 

 1.56

 

 

18.55***

 

 

4.18

Total

30- 1=29

 154.8

 

 

 

***P < 0.01, df 4, 25.

 

 

  

 Table - 12    

                Dunnet’s t test table against control for Analgesic activity                                                                       

 

Statistic

 

Pentazocine

 

Chamomilla 3x

    

 

Chamomilla 30c

       

            Chamomilla 0/3                 

 

   

    t

  

    17.08**** 

  

    5.59****

      

    5.59****

       

     13.44****

                                              ****P < 0.001, df 25.

 

 

                                             Table - 14

       Analysis of variance table for Anti-Convulsant activity after treatment.

Source of variation

 df

Sum of squares

Mean sum of   squares

F-ratio

F-table      value

 

Treatment

 

Error

 

5-1=4

 

29- 4=25

 

  222.87

 

  52.5

 

  55.71

 

  2.1

 

 

26.52***

 

 

 4.18

Total

30- 1=29

  275.37

 

 

 

***P < 0.01, df 4, 25.

 

 

 

Table - 15

           Dunnet’s t test table against control for Anti-Convulsant activity                                                

 

Statistic

 

Phenytoin

 

Chamomilla 3x

     

 

Chamomilla 30c

       

  

  Chamomilla 0/3                 

 

   

    t

  

     4.53**** 

  

     1.73**

      

     1.58*

       

       2.96***

                     ****P < 0.001, *** P < 0.01, ** P < 0.1, * P < 0.5, df 25.

 

 

Conclusion

 

In conclusion, the homoeopathic remedy, characterized by infinitesimal doses and by dynamization according to Hahnemann’s preparation technique has a marked informational character. The possibility of storing information from molecules can be used for therapeutical as well as experimental purpose.

 

The result of the study justify the opportunity of future researches concerning the intimate mechanism of inhibitory action on central nervous system of Chamomilla homoeopathic potencies in accordance with principle of similia.    

References

  1. Chamomilla, Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India, Vol- 5, Controller of publications, Government of India, 1986, pp 22.

  2. D’Amour, F.E and Smith, D.L; J. Pharm.Exptl. Therap.  1941, 72: 74

  3. Kulkarni,S.K; Life Sciences, 1980, 27 : 185 – 188

  4. Eddy, N.B. and Leimbach, D. J; J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap. 1953, 107: 385

  5. Dewis, P.B; Brit. J. Pharmac. Chemotherap.1953, 8 : 46

  6. Kulkarni, S.K and Dandiya, P.C; Indian J. Med. Res.1975, 63: 462-468

  7. Misra, A.K; Dandiya, P.C and Kulkarni, S.K; Indian J. Pharmac. 1973, 5 : 449-450

  8. Kulkarni, S.K; Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 1981, 252 : 124-132

  9. Hahnemann. S. ‘Materia Medica Pura’ Vol-1, reprint edition 1992, B.Jain publishers Pvt.Ltd, pp.379-381

  10. Guillemain, J. (1983) La recherché pharmacologique appliqué a I’Homeopathie, sa grandeur, ses faiblesses, Homeop.Fr 71, pp.191 – 200.

  11. Cristea A., Teodorescu – Negres.S, Darie.V et al  “ Chamomilla Homoeopathic Dilution effect on Central Nervous System – An Experimental pharmacological study”, Europ. Neuropsychopharmacol.3, pp.  446 – 447.

  12. Richard Hughes ‘A manual of pharmaco - dynamics’ 6 th reprint edition 2001, B.Jain publishers Pvt.Ltd, pp. 382

 
 
 
   
Hosting supported by aippg .Copyright © Dr.Mansoor Ali
 Best viewed in 800/600 resolution and 24/32 bit colour.