|
Introduction
"A man's life may be said to be a gift of his blood
pressure, just as Egypt is a gift of the Nile". So said Sir
William Osler, an icon of modern medicine and the man said to be
the most influential physician in history.
Sir Osler may be indeed right, as arterial pressure is essential
for sustaining life, the most important factor which ensures
that the circulation of blood reaches all the tissues in our
body. At the same time, an elevated blood pressure can be most
inimical to life, if persisting over a period of time.
The pioneers in
the study of arterial pressure, Reverend Stephen Hale, who made
the first blood pressure measurement on animals, and Scipione
Riva Rocci, who invented the blood pressure cuff, were probably
not aware of the full significance of their discoveries. It was
only in the late 1950's that the medical world became aware of
the importance of high blood pressure as a precursor of
complications commonly attributed to "old age".
At the present
day, an elevated blood pressure level is recognized as the most
important public health problem in the developed countries, and
essential hypertension is held responsible for more than 95% of
the cases. It is common, asymptomatic, and lead to lethal
complications if left untreated. The "silent killer" as it is
known, is gradually becoming a problem of enormous proportions
in the developing world also.
The practitioners
of the allopathic system of medicine have tried to combat this
malady by trying to develop drugs designed to reduce the high
arterial pressure. Over the years they have been successful in
developing drugs with profound blood pressure lowering
capabilities, but the magnitude of the problem at the community
level has remained. The reasons for this are many, including the
adverse effect of drugs and relatively higher cost of treatment,
but the absence of a holistic view of disease is probably the
most important. As with other conditions, the inclination is to
treat the "results" of disease. This ultimately proves less
successful, and is also detrimental to the health of the
patient.
The homoeopathic
physician on the other hand, considers disease as a disturbance
of the life force, made known to him only through signs and
symptoms. He understands that the patient is sick prior to the
localization of disease. The hypertension, like other diagnoses,
is considered only as a part of the whole. The homoeopathic
approach also does not have the other drawbacks seen with the
allopathic system, like adverse effect of drugs and high cost of
treatment. Thus it is potentially suitable to deal with the
problem of essential hypertension, especially in a developing
country like India.
Unfortunately
there is little information regarding the management of
hypertension in homoeopathic literature. Many of the classical
therapeutic text books and materia medicae do not mention the
condition at all. This is possibly due to the lack of awareness
about hypertension during the earlier days of homoeopathy.
Clinical studies on the effectiveness of homoeopathic medicines
in hypertension also has been few. Off the studies published,
most have tried to evaluate the action of "specific" drugs
rather than use an individualized approach.
All these
factors, have encouraged me to take up this study on the
efficacy of homoeopathic medicines in the management of
essential hypertension. It is hoped that useful information will
be gained both on the entity of essential hypertension, as well
as the homoeopathic approach to its management.
Survey of Literature
Definition and classification
Blood pressure2 is a continuously distributed variable in
populations, with no clear distinction between hypertensive and
normotensive individuals. The distribution follows a bell shaped
curve, slightly skewed to the right. The risks associated also
follows the blood pressure curve, and it is not possible to
identify a level of blood pressure that carries risk and one
that does not. Any definition of "hypertension" is therefore
arbitrary.
The WHO and the International society of Hypertension has
defined hypertension as "a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg.
or greater, or a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg. or
greater in subjects who are not taking anti-hypertensive
medication". This traditional level of hypertension is a
pragmatic one, based on evidence4,5 of treatment benefit,
balanced against side effects and cost of treatment. Indeed,
hypertension can be defined as blood pressure6 levels above
which treatment does more good than harm.
Various organizations have classified blood pressure into
different levels of severity. The classification of WHO - ISH is
given below.
|
Category * |
Systolic BP
(mm Hg) |
Diastolic BP
(mm Hg) |
|
Optimal + |
<120 |
<80 |
|
Normal |
<130 |
<85 |
|
High Normal |
130-139 |
85-89 |
|
Hypertension |
Grade I (Mild)
Borderline |
140-159
140-149 |
90-99
90-94 |
Grade II (Moderate)
|
160-179 |
100-109 |
|
Grade III (Severe) |
≥
180 |
≥
110 |
|
Isolated Systolic Hypertension
Borderline
|
≥
140
140-149 |
< 90
< 90 |
Table
1. WHO - ISH classification of blood pressure
* For adults
aged 18 or older.
* When a patients systolic and diastolic blood pressure falls
into different categories, the higher category should apply
+ With respect to cardiovascular risk
Hypertension: The
Problem
Cardiovascular
diseases7 are responsible for around 20% of all deaths
worldwide. They are the principal cause of death in developed
countries, accounting for about 50% of all deaths. They are also
emerging as a prominent public health problem in developing
countries, ranking third among the main causes, with
approximately 16% of all deaths.
The most common among these diseases are hypertension, ischemic
heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Considering3 the
central role of hypertension in the pathogenesis of both
coronary heart disease and stroke, it is clear that its control
is one of the biggest challenges facing public health
authorities and medical practitioners all over the world.
Prevalence: Global
Hypertension8
affects up to a quarter of the adult population. The prevalence
depends on the age, racial composition and the criteria used to
define the condition. In a white population, 20% of the adults
in the age group 35 - 65 years have a diastolic blood pressure
in the range 90 - 109 mm Hg, 4 - 5% have a range of 110 - 129 mm
Hg, and 0.5% have blood pressure levels > 130 mm Hg. The
prevalence is even higher in the non white population.
Prevalence:
India
Epedemiological9 studies show a rising trend in the
prevalence of hypertension in India in the last three decades.
This is in contrast to with the findings reported in developed
countries, which show a decrease in prevalence. Studies10 show
overall prevalence in the age group 25 - 64 years as 25.6 %.
This11 figure is close to 33% in the age group 45 - 65 years.
Prevalence:
Kerala
Kerala has a high prevalence of hypertension, as shown by
the results of a multicentric study10 among five Indian cities,
where Thiruvananthapuram had the highest prevalence of
hypertension with 30.7% of the population affected. The
percentages are much higher in the elderly population, and in
urban than in rural areas
In a study12 conducted by the hypertension study group among
subjects aged = 60 years, 69% of the sample from urban areas and
55% from rural areas were found to be hypertensive. Kerala11
also has a high prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors
like obesity, smoking, lack of exercise etc., which is more
marked in the urban population.
The "rule of halves"
The
magnitude of the problem is
compounded by the fact that hypertension remains an "iceberg"
disease, with a large percentage of cases remaining undetected.
In the early 1970's it became evident that only half the
hypertensive subjects in developed countries were aware of the
condition. About half of them were being treated with drugs, and
only half of those treated were adequately treated. This came to
be known as the "rule of halves", and the situation in the
developing countries is likely to be far worse.
Causes of Hypertension
Traditionally,
hypertension has been classified into essential2 or primary,
where there is no evident cause, and secondary, where there is
an evident anatomical, pathological or biochemical abnormality.
But this view of essential hypertension is increasingly being
challenged with the recognition of constitutional, dietary and
environmental factors in its pathogenesis.
Essential5 hypertension is the commonest among the causes of
hypertension, constituting up to 95% of the cases. Among the
secondary causes, renal diseases account for the majority of
cases. A useful classification is given below
1) Systolic
hypertension with increased pulse pressure
a) With decreased compliance of aorta (arteriosclerosis)
b) With increased stroke volume
i) Aortic regurgitation
ii) Thyrotoxicosis
iii) Fever
iv) A-V fistula
v) Patent ductus arteriosus
2) Systolic and
diastolic hypertension (increased peripheral vascular
resistance)
a) Unknown aetiology
i) Essential hypertension
ii) Toxemia's of pregnancy
iii) Acute intermittent porphyria
b) Renal causes
i) Chronic pyelonephritis
ii) Acute or chronic glomerulonephritis
iii) Polycystic disease
iv) Renovascular stenosis or renal infarction
v) Severe renal diseases e.g. Diabetic nephropathy
vi) Renin producing tumors
c) Endocrine causes
i) Cushing's syndrome / Cushing's disease
ii) Conn's syndrome
iii) Pheochromocytoma
iv) Hypothyroidism
v) Acromegaly
d) Iatrogenic causes
i) Oral contraceptive pills
ii) ACTH & Corticosteroids
iii) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
e) Miscellaneous causes
i) Coarctation of aorta
ii) Poisoning - lead, thallium etc
iii) Polyarteritis nodosa
iv) Increased intravascular- volume - blood transfusion,
Polycythemia vera etc.
v) Increased intracranial pressure
Next Page
|