| |
A scientific
re-reading of Homoeopathy on the basis of observations made in
the following articles is expected to impart a new thrust and
orientation to further research activities in this field. Author
will be deeply gratified of his humble endeavor if this little
volume succeeds in its minimum objective, by igniting such a
creative passion at least in a single individual reading this
book. A detailed study of the fundamental aspects of molecular
interactions underlying the phenomena of vital activity,
discussed under the separate title may prove useful in this
context.
See, how a proper
understanding of the protein molecular kinetics of regulatory
mechanisms of chemical conversions, transfer of genetic
information and other physico-chemical processes in the living
cells, help us in evolving a scientific and rational explanation
to the prime Homoeopathic therapeutic principle– Simila
similibus curentur’. Try to re-explore this most vital and
contentious concept in the light of modern revelations regarding
various forms of bio-molecular inhibitions and activations that
constitute the complex mechanisms of disease and cure. The
famous ‘lock and key model’ hypotheses promoted by Fischer and
Coshland, illustrating the decisive role played by the spatial
configuration of biological molecules in ensuring their specific
recognition and interactions may be particularly noted. The
therapeutic properties exhibited by highly diluted homoeopathic
medicines could be hereafter satisfactorily explained on the
basis of modern concepts of molecular imprinting and hydrosome
formations.
Homoeopathic
technique of drug potentisation may be viewed as an indirect
process of synthesizing artificial ‘locks’ exactly fitting to
the molecular ‘ keys’, whereas the ‘keys’ are the
disease-causing molecules or ions. Sophisticated methods
developed by the emerging technologies of ‘Molecular Imprinted
Polymers’ and ‘Molecular Imprinted Gels’ have to be considered
in this connection. Information regarding the phenomenon of
shape-memory property and various so called ‘smart’ materials is
also valuable. The extraordinary and wonderful physico-chemical
properties of water have serious implications in the scientific
study of Homoeopathy. The observation that water, with its
super-molecular structure behaving somewhat like a polymer,
exhibits shape-memory property is very exciting. Further studies
are needed to verify whether various disaccharides and
oligosaccharides such as cane-sugar and milk-sugar exhibit any
shape memory or molecular imprinting capabilities.
According to the
observations so far made by the author, Cellulose, a natural
polysaccharide glyco-polymer with its various bio-friendly and
shape memory characteristics, appears to be a very promising
candidate for homoeopathic molecular imprinting and
target-oriented drug delivery systems of coming days.
Ultimately, the theory of Hydrosome therapy will help us
demonstrate how an ultra-minute dose of the highly diluted
homoeopathic medicine, not having even a remote chance of a
single drug molecule contained in it, displays ‘dynamic’
therapeutic powers, when administered in specifically indicated
clinical conditions. The homoeopathic theory of chronic diseases
and ‘miasms’ could be re-validated in the light of latest
concepts of molecular imprinted proteins, antibodies and ‘prions’.
In short, the revolutionary concepts introduced in the following
articles may pave the way in gaining a new and refined
understanding of Homoeopathy. This scientific re-reading is
expected to raise this noble healing art to its rightful status
of a specialized branch of modern molecular medicine, thereby
liberating it from the centuries-old ridicule and contempt.
A couple of articles collected from various inimical sources,
vehemently attacking and denigrating Homoeopathy, are also
included herewith. These articles may enable the reader to sort
out the main criticisms leveled against Homoeopathy by its
opponents, and seek to scientifically disprove their arguments.
To march ahead into the new millennium not as mere ‘magic
healers’ but men of science, homoeopaths have to settle accounts
face to face with their own predecessors as well as adversaries
simultaneously. It is hoped that this dialectical approach
advocated by the author will empower homoeopaths to stand
theoretically and materially fortified in winning such a
double-sided ideological battle. Let us proudly keep the banner
of scientific homoeopathy high!
Molecular Mechanism of ‘Disease’ and ‘Cure’
According to the modern scientific view, disease
should be understood as a state of vital activity, deranged to
such an extent that the normal physiological functions of the
organism are negatively affected. These derangements are
expressed as groups of more or less subjective and objective
manifestations and sensations called symptoms. Normal vital
activity gets deranged due to a break in the continuity of
molecular conversions in one or other underlying biochemic
pathways, due to any defect or non-availability of some
essential biological molecules such as enzymes, receptors,
transporters, hormones, chemical mediators, structural molecules
and various substrates playing crucial roles in the regular
biochemic interactions.
Molecular
defects amounting to pathology may be caused by diverse factors
such as :-
1) There may be abnormalities associated with primary
protein synthesis. In this category, one or more particular
types of essential protein molecules could not be synthesized,
or defective proteins are synthesized owing to some inherent
structural disorders of concerned genes. Apart from this,
defects or non-availability of regulatory enzymes or other
proteins associated with the expression of gene functions may
also result in such a situation. Moreover, obstructions in
diverse molecular conversion pathways also could affect the
availability of various essential molecules and substrates
required for normal protein synthesis. Nutritional deficiencies
of essential amino acids and co-factors may also affect the
synthesis and spatial stabilization of various types of
proteins.
2) Molecular defects may arise from the influence of various
physical factors such as temperature, ionizing radiations,
medium pH, hydration levels etc. Variations in any of these
factors beyond certain limits are found to effect harmful
changes in the three-dimensional spatial configuration of
protein molecules, thereby rending them incapable of performing
their specific functions.
3) Raw materials required for the synthesis of biological
molecules inside the organism are obtained from the environment
through various routes such as nutrition, respiration etc. Any
deficiency in the regular supply of these essential components
may invariably result in some kind of derangements in the
synthesis of biological molecules and associated vital
activities.
4) Most important and universal category of pathological
bio-molecular defects are those arising from the inhibitions
caused by the binding of some exogenous or endogenous molecules
or ions on to the essential biological molecules, thereby
rendering them incapable of performing their normal functions.
Bio-molecular inhibitions or blockages coming under the latter
type are the major cause of the commonly encountered
pathological conditions. Such bindings may disturb the specific
three-dimensional spatial configurations of those molecules,
preventing them from discharging their normal functions of
recognition, binding, conversion, transportation etc. If such
inhibitions occur to the mediatory enzymes regulating the gene
expression, the resultant pathological condition may resemble
very much that of original genetic disorders. Even in the case
of disorders of purely genetic origin, metabolites accumulated
due to the primary derangements may bind to various biological
molecules, resulting in secondary inhibitions in different
biochemical pathways.
When a particular
type of disease-causing molecules bind to and block a particular
type of biological molecules, a particular biochemical channel
is broken or deranged, resulting in a particular disease
condition expressed by a particular train of subjective and
objective symptoms. Metabolites accumulating at various
molecular sites due to the break in the continuity of related
biochemical pathways might create further molecular blocks in
other channels. Toxic or harmful metabolic by-products such as
as various types of free radicals and super oxides may also
attack biological molecules. Exogenous materials such as
bacterial and viral toxins, chemicals, glycosides and alkaloids
of plant origin etc. are capable of producing pathologic
molecular inhibitions. Antibodies, hormones, neuro-mediators and
various other endogenous substances also are capable of creating
troublesome molecular blocks. This process of serial blockages
and inhibitions ultimately lead to a complex totality of
multiple derangements and pathological symptoms. In general,
this is the molecular mechanism of pathology.
The famous ‘lock
and key model’ hypotheses of Fischer and Coshland, describing
the decisive role played by the spatial configuration of
biological molecules in ensuring their specific recognition and
interactions may be borne in mind while discussing the molecular
kinetics of bio-molecular inhibitions and reactivations. Any
rational therapeutic intervention, under the label of whatever
medical system, should be knowingly or otherwise aimed at the
removal of such pathological molecular inhibitions and
reactivating the obstructed pathways. It should also eliminate
those disease-causing molecules from the system, and prevent the
occurrence of secondary molecular blocks.
‘Simila Similibus Curentur’ or ‘Law of Similars’
This great doctrine, formulated by Samuel Hahnemann,
constitutes the basis of Homeopathic therapeutic system. It
means ‘like cures like’, that is, diseases are cured by agents
capable of producing symptoms resembling those found in the
disease under treatment. According to this theory, since a state
of disease is expressed essentially as a group of subjective and
objective symptoms, the proper medicine for any disease is the
one, which is capable of producing a similar group of symptoms
when given to a healthy person. Homoeopathic Materia Medica
contains nothing other than a systematic and more or less
complete recording of symptoms elicited by different substances,
when administered to persons in health.
Equipped with the latest scientific understanding regarding the
kinetics of the intricate molecular mechanisms of vital
activity, disease and cure, we are now in a position to examine
the ‘Law of Similars’ in a new perspective.
A drug is essentially a sample of substance of vegetable,
animal, mineral, or synthetic origin. Such a sample may contain
one or more types of molecules or ions. A sample of simple
substance, containing only a single type of molecules is very
difficult to obtain. Even purely synthetic drugs may contain
some foreign molecules in the form of one or other kinds of
contaminations at various stages of preparation, preservation,
handling etc. Heterogeneous drugs of vegetable or animal origins
may be composed of hundreds or thousands of types of molecules.
When such a sample of drug is introduced into the living system,
the constituent molecules undergo various chemical changes,
ionization etc. The resultant molecules and ions behave exactly
as foreign molecules in the system. Some of them may bind to
various biological molecules and metabolites, resulting in
bio-molecular blocks, deranging some of the biochemical
channels, manifesting as groups of subjective and objective
symptoms. Since a heterogeneous drug sample may contain
different types of molecules, capable of binding to different
molecular targets, they will be eliciting different groups or
trains of symptoms.
Each specific
group of symptoms represents a derangement in a specific
biochemic cannel. If a particular group of symptoms produced by
a particular drug resembles the symptoms of a particular known
disease condition, it clearly indicates that the actual
disease-causing molecules and some of the molecules contained in
the drug sample could attack the same target molecules,
producing same biochemical derangements. Here, the drug
molecules and the disease-causing molecules should have some
similar inherent characteristics, by which they could bind to
the same biological molecules. As far as the particular
molecular targets are concerned, the drug molecules and disease
-molecules are said to be having a competitive relationship.
This competitive relationship is due to the similarity of
spatial configurations of the drug molecules and disease-causing
molecules or their active groups. The important fact is that,
due to this similarity in spatial configuration, they could bind
to same target molecules, resulting in similar molecular
inhibitions and symptoms.
Viewing from this standpoint, when a drug is said to be a
homoeopathic similimum to a particular disease, it only means
that the drug contain some molecules having spatial
configurations similar to the particular disease-causing
molecules, so that they can compete with them for binding with
same biological molecules. In most cases, according to the
kinetics of molecular inhibitions and reactivations, such a
competitive relationship between disease-causing molecules and
drug molecules result in the de-blocking and reactivation of
biological molecules and the removal of inhibitions that
underlie the particular disease condition. The disease is said
to have been cured by the drug, which was homoeopathic to that
particular disease. In the case of homoeopathic cures using
highly potentised medicines, an entirely different mechanism is
working.
Here, instead of
drug molecules, molecularly imprinted pockets of water, bearing
the negative spatial configuration of drug molecules are
utilized. These molecular pockets, by virtue of their special
affinity due to the configurational similarity, acts as
artificial locks for the molecular keys comprising of
disease-causing molecules. The active groups of the
disease-causing molecules are bound and entrapped by the
molecular pockets of water, thereby liberating the biological
molecules from inhibitions. This interpretation hopefully
provides a reasonably reliable foundation for further scientific
inquiries into the basic principle of Homoeopathy, ‘Simila
Similibus Curentur’ at the molecular level!
‘Drug Proving’ in Homoeopathy
The Homoeopathic Materia Medica contains a systematic
record of subjective and objective symptoms produced by each
drug, when administered in healthy individuals. This method of
eliciting symptoms is known as ‘drug proving’. In fact, this is
an indirect way of studying the complex bio-molecular
inhibitions that could be created in the living system by the
various molecules contained in the particular drug sample. As
far as modern science and technology has not advanced so as to
identify and isolate each type of molecules in a given drug
sample, and to understand the kinetics of the multitude of
bio-molecular interactions and inhibitions those drug molecules
could induce in the system, homoeopathic drug proving will
remain the most effective and reliable technique for this study.
More over, it still remains a dream for modern science to
acquire necessary tools to identify and study the bio-molecular
mechanism underlying the millions of subjective and objective
symptoms elicited during health, disease and drug proving. Here
lies the paramount importance and practical value of
homoeopathic ‘Drug proving’.
‘Modalities’ or Conditions of
Aggravations and Ameliorations
In homoeopathy, much importance is accorded to the
‘Modalities’ or conditions of aggravations and ameliorations of
each symptom. A symptom unqualified with any modality is
considered almost worthless in homeopathic case study. Along
with modalities, factors such as causations, locations,
sensations, extensions, alternations, concomitants,
chronological order etc. associated with each symptom are also
taken into account, in selecting a similimum. A singular
subjective or objective symptom may not be by itself enough to
indicate the exact molecular block. Molecular blocks of entirely
different types may some times produce seemingly similar
individual symptoms. Derangement in a particular biochemic
pathway due to the inhibition of a particular biological
molecule will exhibit a complex train of symptoms with
particular modalities and qualifications. A singular symptom
unqualified with any modality will not help us to identify the
exact bio-molecular inhibitions or the deranged bio-chemic
pathways underlying the particular disease condition. Here lies
the importance of the whole train of symptoms accompanied by
modalities, causations, locations, sensations, extensions,
concomitance, alternations, chronological order etc. It is not
any single unqualified symptom, but the complex train of
symptoms that matter in identifying the exact similimum. In
homeopathy, this is expressed by the aphorism ‘totality of
symptoms’.
Next Page |
|