OBSERVATION NO

J T KENT

H A ROBERTS

1

PROLONGED AGGRAVATION AND FINAL DECLINE OF THE PATIENT

• TOO DEEP ANTIPSORIC ADMINISTRATION

• CASE INCURABLE

• POOR PROGNOSIS

• ANTIDOTE THE PREVIOUSLY ADMINISTERED REMEDY

• ADMINISTER LESS DEEP ACTING REMEDY

1 SIMILAR TO KENTS 1 OBSERVATION

2

LONG AGGRAVATION FINAL SLOW IMPROVEMENT

·         BEGINNING OF MARKED TISSUE CHANGE IN SOME ORGAN

·         CURABLE

·         GOOD PROGNOSIS

2 SIMILAR TO KENTS 2 OBSERVATION

3

AGGRAVATION QUICK SHORT AND STRONG WITH RAPID IMPROVEMENT OF THE PATIENT

·         HOMOEOPATHIC AGGRAVATION

·         GOOD PROGNOSIS

·         NO STRUCTURAL CHANGE OF VITAL ORGANS;IF PRESENT THEY MAY BE SUPERFICIAL

3 SIMILAR TO KENTS 3 OBSERVATION

4

NO AGGRAVATION WHAT SO EVER WITH RECOVERY OF PATIENT

·         IDEAL CURE

·         NO TENDENCY TO TISSUE CHANGE OF VITAL ORGAN

·         GOOD PROGNOSIS

4 SIMILAR TO KENTS 4 OBSERVATION

5

AMELIORATION COMES FIRST AND AGGRAVATION COMES AFTERWARDS

• EITHER REMEDY SELECTED SUPERFICIAL OR PATIENT INCURABLE

• PROGNOSIS BAD

5 SIMILAR TO KENTS 5 OBSERVATION

6

TOO SHORT RELIEF OF SYMPTOMS

• SOME CONDITION THAT INTERFERS WITH THE ACTION OF THE REMEDY

• ACTION OF REMEDY MUCH MORE QUICKLY EXHAUSTED IN THE RAPID PHASE OF ACUTE DISEASE

• IN CHRONIC DISEASE THIS MEANS STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN VITAL ORGANS HAD TAKEN PLACE

• PROGNOSIS BAD

6 SIMILAR TO KENTS 6 OBSERVATION

7

FULL TIME AMELIORATION OF SYMPTOM,YET NO SPECIAL RELIEF OF THE PATIENT

• HOMOEOPATHIC PALLIATION

• INCURABLE CASES

• PATIENT CANNOT IMPROVE BEYOND A CERTAIN DEGREE

• PROGNOSIS BAD

7 SIMILAR TO KENTS 7 OBSERVATION

8

SOME PATIENT PROVE EVERY REMEDY THEY GET

• IDIOSYNCRASY FOR THE REMEDY

• TOO SENSITIVE REACTION OF THE VITAL FORCE

• PROGNOSIS BAD

• START THE CASE WITH HIGH POTENCY AND STEADILY COME DOWN TO LOWER POTENCIES

8 SIMILAR TO KENTS 8 OBSERVATION

9

ACTION OF MEDICINE UPON PROVERS

RELATED TO DRUG PROVING

• OBSERVE CONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF PROVERS

• SUBTRACT THESE SYMPTOM FROM THE PROVING-GENUINE PATHOGENETIC SYMPTOMS ARE GOT

• CONSTITUTIONAL SYMPTOM SUBSIDE DURING PROVING

• IF PRESENT NOTE THE CHANGE IN THEM

         PROVER SHOULD BE HEALTHY

         DRUG NOT IN MIXTURED FORM

10

NEW SYMPTOM APPEARING AFTER REMEDY

• GREATER THE NEW SYMPTOM MORE DOUBT REGARDING PRESCRIPTION

• PROGNOSIS BAD

• NEW SYMPTOM PASSES AWAY ,PATIENT WILL SETTLE DOWN TO ORIGINAL STATE $ NO IMPROVEMENT TAKE PLACE

10 UNFAVOURABLE SIGN

IN CASE WHERE SYMPTOM ARE VERY FEW FOR SELECTION OF SIMILIMUM;PARTIALLY SIMILAR REMEDY CAN BRING FORTH THE OTHER HIDDEN SYMPTOM WHICH WERE A DEFINITE PART OF THE CASE

11

OLD SYMPTOM OBSERVED TO REAPPEAR

• PROGNOSIS GOOD

• DIRECTION OF CURE

• IF OLD SYMPTOM COME BACK TO STAY;REPETITION OF THE DOSE IS OFTEN NECESSARY

12

SYMPTOMS TAKE WRONG DIRECTION

• SUPPRESSION TAKING PLACE

• ANTIDOTE THE CASE

• PROGNOSIS POOR

EG:PRESCRIBING FOR RHEUMATISM OF KNEE ,SYMPTOMS RELIEVED BUT AN ANXIETY OVER HEART

CONTRARY TO ORDER OF CURE.